The Power of Two: When Doctors and Patients Decide Together

A Shift from Paternalism to Partnership

For decades, medicine followed a paternalistic model—physicians made decisions, and patients followed. That model worked when treatment options were limited and information scarce. Today, however, medical care has become highly personalized. From surgical approaches to pharmacologic therapies, multiple viable options often exist for the same condition. In this environment, shared decision-making (SDM) is not just ideal—it’s essential.

SDM invites patients and clinicians to collaborate, blending clinical expertise with the patient’s values, preferences, and lifestyle. The result: better understanding, higher satisfaction, improved adherence, and ultimately, better outcomes.

Evidence That Shared Decision-Making Works

Research consistently shows that when patients are actively involved in choosing their treatment:

• Outcomes improve. Patients who understand the risks and benefits make choices that align with their goals, leading to fewer regrets and better post-treatment satisfaction.

• Adherence increases. Patients are far more likely to follow through with treatment plans they helped design.

• Costs decrease. Avoiding unnecessary interventions or surgeries—especially when less invasive or medical options exist—reduces waste and complications.

• 
  

For example, in gynecologic surgery, AIMIS data show that when women are informed about non-surgical or minimally invasive alternatives, many opt for approaches that minimize recovery time and pain—demonstrating SDM’s power to reduce overtreatment.

The Role of the Physician: Expert, Guide, and Partner

True shared decision-making requires humility from clinicians. The physician brings evidence, expertise, and experience. The patient brings priorities—fertility wishes, pain tolerance, cultural values, or family responsibilities—that no algorithm can quantify.When these perspectives meet, medicine becomes more humane and effective. Physicians are no longer gatekeepers of knowledge—they’re interpreters and partners helping patients navigate complex choices.

Technology and Education: Enabling Better Decisions

Modern educational platforms like those at AIMIS are transforming how shared decision-making occurs. Through videos, webinars, and in-person workshops, patients and providers alike are learning to discuss options using the same evidence base.Decision aids, interactive models, and personalized outcome predictors now allow physicians to show—not just tell—what different paths may look like. These tools elevate SDM from theory to everyday clinical practice.

A Call to Action for Clinicians and Patients

Shared decision-making is not a soft skill—it’s a standard of care. It demands time, transparency, and trust, but the return is profound. For clinicians, it means better engagement and fewer conflicts. For patients, it means ownership of their health and confidence in their care.

At AIMIS, our mission is to champion evidence-based education and empower both physicians and patients to make informed, collaborative choices. Whether through minimally invasive surgery, non-opioid pain strategies, or advanced robotic techniques, every decision should begin with one guiding principle: We decide together.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

About the Author

Christopher A. Guinn is the CEO of the American Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery (AIMIS), a leading organization dedicated to advancing physician education and improving patient outcomes through evidence-based, industry-supported medical programs. With over three decades of experience in healthcare leadership and education, he continues to champion initiatives that bridge innovation, training, and compassionate patient care.